mdlbear: (copyleft)
[personal profile] mdlbear

Some good news, for once, from the front lines of the Intellectual "Property" wars:

Techdirt: Big Guns Come Out In Effort To Show RIAA's Lawsuits Are Unconstitutional.

In the past, it's been noted that the RIAA has curiously avoided suing any Harvard students, with one of the theories being that Harvard had made it quite clear to the RIAA that it would fight back hard. And, with Harvard law school at its disposal, and various professors there indicating that they had serious legal problems with the RIAA's strategy, the RIAA simply decided to ignore any file sharing going on at that prestigious university.

However, for RIAA critic and well known law professor, Charles Nesson, waiting around for the RIAA to sue someone at Harvard was getting boring, so he went out and found a case to participate in. Along with two third year law students, Nesson has hit back hard on the RIAA's efforts in a court filing, where it's noted that the very basis for many of the RIAA's lawsuits is very likely unconstitutional.

Groklaw: The Bilski Decision Is In: Buh-Bye [Most] Business Methods Patents - As text & updated 3Xs

Pop some champagne! The Appeals Court decision is in on Bilski: I'm still reading it, but on first quick reading, one thing is clear: it's a win! Eligible patent matter just got smaller. Here's a snip from the opening:

Some additional analysis on Techdirt:

I don't say this often, but it looks like the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) -- or "the patent court" -- got a big one mostly right. In the rehearing of the Bilski case concerning the patentability of software and business method patents, CAFC just came out with its ruling that will significantly limit software and business method patents, bringing the rules way back towards what they were years ago, and effectively rolling back some of the earlier, dreadful, CAFC decisions that opened the barn doors towards tons and tons of software and business method patents.

This news cheers me greatly, though not enough to make up for the jump in the interest rate on my home equity line of credit. Ouch!

(7:35 locked in a significantly lower interest rate than the one I saw on the web and panicked over. May have been a bit of an overreaction, but I'm glad I did it anyway. I'd been putting it off for too long.)

Date: 2008-11-01 04:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lemmozine.livejournal.com
You're giving me song ideas here.

I'm wondering, are there very many humorous songs on the subject of patents, copyrights and/or intellectual property. The only one I can think of, offhand, is my own The Parody Pirates.

What I have in mind is a humorous ballad about a company that decides to copyright or trademark a letter of the alphabet - say, "e," and sue all the people that use it without paying royalties.

The challenge would, of course, be to write a song that doesn't use the letter "e," but is about the letter "e."

Has anything like that already been done?

Date: 2008-11-01 04:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mdlbear.livejournal.com
Go for it.

There's my own "High Barratry", of course, about SCO. And I once worked for Zilog, which tried to trademark the letter Z. (Intel later tried it with "i".)

Patenting Letters, Numbers, etc.

Date: 2008-11-01 07:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] idea-fairy.livejournal.com
Do a Google search on the phrase

"Patenting Pi"

with the quotes as shown.

You'll find several mentions of the concept by different people, including a "Winnie the Pooh" parody by me.

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Oct. 1st, 2014 10:18 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios