mdlbear: blue fractal bear with text "since 2002" (Default)
mdlbear ([personal profile] mdlbear) wrote2007-01-16 08:57 pm

Gadget lust, or lust gadgets?


Boing Boing: Two-person teledildonic rig
REMEMBER THE JOKE running around the net about remote sexual devices? The things you do to one part are replicated on the other, and so on an so forth? Out of town for the weekend with a milk delivery during one of those days? Purchase the Virtual-Hole from a Japanese company called Segment Inc and you can rest easy.

The Virtual-Hole is a two part device, one for males, one for females. The male side is a chrome bowling pin that has has an orifice with seven motors around it. The female part is the usual multi-pronged pitchfork with enough nubs and widgets to make the most jaded person wonder. It also has seven sensors embedded in it. Guess what they correspond to?
(Product site -- even less safe for work)

[identity profile] saffronrose.livejournal.com 2007-01-17 05:49 am (UTC)(link)
great engrish, too

[identity profile] idea-fairy.livejournal.com 2007-01-17 06:06 am (UTC)(link)
Several thoughts:

It seems to focus on just the genitals, to the exclusion of other touching.
Not my cup of tea. It doesn't seem to provide anything I can't do manually.

Their Web site shows the man fully clothed, but when you scroll down to the female version the woman is wearing just panties. Isn't that kind of sexist?

How easy would it be to set up non-heterosexual encounters (either two male units or two female units)? Or does the hardware not have the right combinations of sensors and actuators to allow that?

What about threesomes or whatever?

All in all, I probably won't be buying one any time soon.

[identity profile] mia-mcdavid.livejournal.com 2007-01-17 12:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Waitaminnit!!! It's a one-way linkup! Sensation transfers from stick to hole, but not from hole to stick!

The woman is doing all the work!!!!!!!

No fuckin' way!