Weighty Matters

[mdlbear]

I was all set to start another curmudgeon post today, except that I read about "A massive change" and fell down a rabbit hole. Tl;dr: everything you think you know about the metric system has just changed completely. You won't notice the difference.

You probably know at least a little about the history of the metric system. Developed during the French Revolution, it was based on the unit of length, the mètre ("meter", in the American English familiar to most of my readers), which was defined as one ten-millionth of the distance between the north pole and the equator on the meridian passing through Paris. The gramme was defined as the weight of a cube of pure water with sides of one-hundredth of a metre and at the temperature of melting ice. Or in more familiar terms, the weight of a cubic centimetre of water. The French philosopher Marquis de Condorcet called it a system "for all people for all time".

The intent was for the system to be based on unchanging physical phenomena. That didn't last. It's really hard to use the Earth as a reference, so in 1795 a brass metre bar was constructed, and in 1799 two platinum reference objects were manufactured, the mètre des Archives and kilogramme des Archives. (The standard metre was found to be about 0.02% short, meaning that the standard was now based only on a couple of chunks of metal.) New reference objects were created in the 1870s.

I'm going to skip ahead to 1960, when the metre was redefined by the eleventh GCPM (Conférence Générale des Poids et Mesures) as exactly 1,650,763.73 wavelengths of the orange-red emission line in the electromagnetic spectrum of the krypton-86 atom in a vacuum. That conference also defined the rest of the International System of Units (SI, from Système international (d'unités). In 1967 the 13th CGPM redefined the second, which had been defined in 1958 as 1/86400 of the year 1900, as 9192631770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium-133 atom.

The nice thing about that definition of the second is that it can't change. That made it possible to redefine the metre, as the distance light travels in 1/299,792,458 of a second. The speed of light in a vacuum isn't going to change, either. That leaves the kilogram.

All the units of the SI are derived from a small number of base units: the metre for length, the second for time, and the kilogram for mass, as well as the ampere for electric current, the kelvin for temperature, the candela for luminous intensity, and the mole for amount of substance.

I've always been kind of intrigued by the mole, which is defined as the number of atoms in 12 grams of pure Carbon-12 (Avogadro's number). Or rather it was defined...

Anyway, of the other base units, the ampere and the mole have definitions that depend on the kilogram. The kelvin, defined as 1/273.16 of the thermodynamic temperature of the triple point of water, doesn't, but it's also rather hard to measure precisely. The candela has a precise definition, but since it's in lumens per watt it depends indirectly on the kilogram.

All that changed yesterday with the new definitions voted in by the 26th CGPM (which take effect May 20, 2019).

The new definitions all result from defining exact values for various physical constants, rather than things that have to be measured. Specifically, the newly-defined constants will be:

• The Planck constant h is exactly 6.62607015×10^−34 joule-second (J⋅s).
• The elementary charge e is exactly 1.602176634×10^−19 coulomb (C).
• The Boltzmann constant k is exactly 1.380649×10^−23 joule per kelvin (J/K).
• The Avogadro constant NA is exactly 6.02214076×1023 reciprocal mole (1/mol).

There are also three that don't change:

• The speed of light c is exactly 299792458 metres per second (m/s).
• The ground state hyperfine splitting frequency of the caesium-133 atom Δν(133Cs)hfs is exactly 9192631770 hertz (Hz).
• The luminous efficacy Kcd of monochromatic radiation of frequency 540×10^12 Hz is exactly 683 lumens per watt (lm/W).

Naturally, the new defined values for the various constants have been chosen to be equal to the best current measurements of them, so there will be exactly no effect on anything you can measure outside of a lab. The whole process had to wait until the various measurements of the kilogram agreed to one part in 10^-8 (1/100,000,000).

So, finally, after just short of two and a quarter centuries, the metric system achieves the original dream of a system of measurement based on unchanging physical phenomena. It's not going to make a whole lot of difference in practice, but it's nice to know that it's not going to change any more.

NaBloPoMo stats:
  10560 words in 17 posts this month (average 621/post)
    837 words in 1 post today

Comments

[siliconshaman]

Relevant XKCD: https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/kilogram.png

[madfilkentist]

Yes, now I understand the reason for yesterday's cartoon!

[moem]

I weigh the same as I did yesterday. I am disappoint.

[johnpalmer]

Ah, but *now*, rather than weighing a multiple of a particular bit of metal, you're now defined in terms of physical law.

I guess that means, if you hate the number on the scale, you must now blame god and not man?

[moem]

That is not a thing I'm capable of doing. Plus, people still made the scale.

[johnpalmer]

I'm not sure if it's inability to hate the number on the scale, or blaming god, but I respect both positions :-).

In point of fact, since I have chronic fatigue syndrome, and am having a good mental energy day, I included that bit only because I realized I could come up with something clever - semi-clever? - kinda-sorta-clever? - resembling clever? :-) - to say. One of the weirdest things about fatigue is knowing your brain does something (like play around with ideas), and finding it utterly incapable of doing so.

This response is because I'm still feeling good enough that I'm not horrified by the thought that my joke could have offended (though I'm sorry if it did - but "oof, sorry, didn't mean to" is very different from "I'm horrible!") and still, amazingly, can think, analyze, and evaluate something other than databases and related things. My only problem is it feels weirdly selfish, and if it is, I'm okay with being human, and a bit selfish. Small victories....

[moem]

I don't blame any gods for anything, is what I meant. Don't worry, I'm nowhere even near the vicinity of being offended. It's not even a distant dot on the horizon right now.
Glad to hear you are, or were, having a good mental energy day. And yeah, being a bit selfish is fine. If only everyone were just a little bit selfish... instead of, like some people, a whole lot!

[kengr]

I've always thought it was a pity that Earth wasn't a *bit* smaller. Enough that they could have set the speed of light at 3e8 m/s. :-)

And while these new standards are verifiable by anybody, I can't help but imagine trying to explain them to aliens who are in their equivalent of the 19th century...

On the other hand there are a few "arbitrary" measures that I expect to move to "convenient" figures eventually if we ever spread out across the stars.

The standard gravity would be much easier if it was 10 m/s^2.

Likewise, standard atmospheric pressure is a lot easier to deal with if you use the "technical atmosphere" (an actual unit!) which is one kilogram force per square centimeter.

[mdlbear]

Also the standard year, although what to do about it is problematic. Probably go decimal and keep the old calendar for traditional festivals.

[kengr]

See the post I just made for some ideas...

https://kengr.dreamwidth.org/1076041.html

[alexseanchai]

*fascinated*