This post
by
technoshaman points to
annathepiper's recent post,
which indicates that word of the latest LJ kerfluffle has been spreading, getting as far as Firefox News.
Now, whether Abe Hassan's comments on
efw can reasonably be
construed as "insulting to fandom" or merely a misguided and tactless
attempt to get into the spirit of the Existential Flame War, the fact is
that people have been construing it as an insult, adding to a
rising tide of cynicism and anger. There is no doubt whatever that Hassan
is a SixApart employee who makes official announcements on
news, and should have known better (added) than to stick his oar into a hornet's nest (to mix a metaphor slightly).
There's an interesting contradiction in LJ's Terms of Service:
Section XIV.2 seems to say that they have to notify you before they take
anything down:
Should any Content that you have authored be reported to LiveJournal as
being offensive or inappropriate, LiveJournal might call upon you to
retract, modify, or protect (by means of private and friends only
settings) the Content in question within a reasonable amount of time, as
determined by the LiveJournal staff. Should you fail to meet such a
request from LiveJournal staff, LiveJournal may terminate your
account. LiveJournal, however, is under no obligation to restrict or
monitor journal Content in any way;
... but section XVI says
You agree to NOT use the Service to:
- Upload, post or otherwise transmit any Content that is unlawful,
harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortious, defamatory, vulgar,
obscene, libelous, invasive to another's privacy (up to, but not
excluding any address, email, phone number, or any other contact
information without the written consent of the owner of such
information), hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise
objectionable; [my emphasis]
... and ends with:
If LiveJournal determines, in its sole and absolute discretion, that any
user is in violation of the TOS, LiveJournal retains the right to
terminate such user's account at any time without prior notice.
Which gives them a loophole they can drive a stretch hummer through, and
they've obviously been invoking this clause with a heavy hand to please
whatever entities are yanking their chain this week. It's an
open question whether this loophole is a recent addition to the TOS, and
whether it would get them into trouble if it came down to a court battle.
I wouldn't count on it.
Bottom line: don't trust 'em. Back up your posts yourself, and start
looking for a way to move your primary blog to a host -- or multiple hosts
-- under your own control. To your scattered servers go, in other words.