I've always known I was overly analytical...

[mdlbear]

Your Livejournal Analysis

Your Livejournal's Age

According to the information you provided, your Livejournal was created on 2002-06-08, meaning that your journal has been around for 216 days. What does this mean?

You are in a fairly common group, with an LJ age of 6 months to 1 year. There's a decent chance that by now you are experiencing some kind of journal burnout, and may be less enthusiastic about the whole thing as you used to be. Perhaps you post less often than you used to, spend less time reading friends' lists as you used to. Maybe you even consider deleting your journal from time to time, or at least let it sit idle.

Your Livejournal Friends

Now let's talk about your friends list. You indicated that you have 14 LJ friends.
This is a decent amount, though still somewhat small. Given the relative age of your journal, this may or may not reflect the list that you will finally end up with. That's okay, as this sort of list makes for a comfortably small group of friends, probably people that you know well outside of the Livejournal community, people you consider good friends.

You also have been listed as a friend by 25 users.
That's a decent amount of people paying attention to your journal. By now your journal is fairly well developed, and so is the list of people who watch it. You've kept your journal interesting enough to keep your friends watching, as well as a few people that are sure to have picked up on it randomly along the line. You might get a few more followers as time goes on, but hey, you are right where it's expected.

Finally in this category, you have a friends to friends-of ratio of 0.56.
This is a relatively low ratio, meaning you add people less often than they add you. There's a good indication this means you simply don't do random addbacks, and only choose to place people on your friends list if they are truly your friend, while others might be adding you simply because they find your journal interesting.

Your Posting Habits

You have indicated that to date, you have made 101 entries into your Livejournal. This gives us an average post rate of 0.46759259259259 posts per day.
This indicates that you update your journal at least once a week, sometimes twice or even three times. You probably include weekly or bi-weekly updates, and the occasional post in thrown in as a kind of rant of sorts. You like to summarize what's going on in your life without going into too many minute details and boring yourself, or your friends.

Your Commenting Habits

According to your information, you have posted 101 comments and have recieved 107 of them over the lifetime of your journal. Let's see what this information can mean.

First of all, this indicates that you have been getting an average of 1.0594059405941 comments for every Livejournal entry that you make.
You can expect roughly one comment per post, sometimes more, although chances are you have entries every now and then that spark discussion, with gaps of no-comments in between. You make a fairly decent effort to incite commenting on your posts, and try to keep your journal fresh and interesting enough that people feel the need to respond to what you have to say.

A more fair measure of how many comments you get might be your average number of comments per post per friend, which is 0.075671852899576. This may seem low to you, especially if you have lots of friends.

The final statistic is the ratio of your comments to comments you get. Your ratio is 0.94392523364486. The higher the ratio, the more talkative you are compared to your friends, comment-wise.

That's it for now! Perhaps there was something insightful in this analasys, and perhaps you learned absolutely nothing. Feel free to post your results on your own Livejournal, and invite your friends to take the Livejournal Analasys today!

(It had better work this time...)

Comments

uhhhh.... overly lengthy post?

[aerowolf.livejournal.com]

I think the code got pasted into your entry about 10 times or so. Could you either edit it out, or put it below an <lj-cut> tag? Thanks!

-Kyle

Re: uhhhh.... overly lengthy post?

[mdlbear]

I get so used to editors like emacs that work reliably, that I've gotten out of the habit of checking.

I think I have it under control now. Thanks for the heads-up.

Re: uhhhh.... overly lengthy post?

[aerowolf.livejournal.com]

Only reason I complained was cuz I had to scroll 14 screens to see anything beyond it. ;)

Thanks again!

-Kyle