mdlbear: blue fractal bear with text "since 2002" (Default)
[personal profile] mdlbear
In a deep sense, systems near their critical point are very similar. The critical point is the value of some controlling parameter at which the system makes a phase change, from ordered (predictable) to disordered (chaotic).

On one side of the critical point, the system has a finite number of stable states; no matter what the initial conditions, the system will end up in one of them. On the other side there is no stable state at all; the system is chaotic, and two sets of initial conditions that are arbitrarily close together will evolve to be arbitrarily far apart, usually in a short time.

Near the critical point, things get unpredictable in a strangely predictable way: the system is mostly stable, and any small instabilities that appear will eventually be damped out, but they may take an arbitrarily long time and involve an arbitrary amount of the system. A pile of sand is a good example; adding a few more grains can start an avalanche, which may be either tiny or huge.

Near the critical point, things are interesting -- often in the sense of the ancient Chinese curse.

It seems reasonably clear that the US's electrical grid is pretty close to critical.

One might think that this is an undesirable situation, but getting back to the stable part of parameter space would require adding a sizeable margin of safety to the system: overengineering it, adding more capacity. The problem is that extra capacity costs money, and in order to be effective it has to sit idle almost all the time. As a wild guess, you'd need about 1/3 more capacity than you normally use (that's the amount you need in an ethernet or a hash table, and as I mentioned systems tend to behave similarly as they approach criticality).

So what actually happens is that the margin of safety gets shaved, for economic reasons, until the level of instability starts to affect the bottom line. This is a feedback loop that, perversely, guarantees that the system will always be close enough to critical that occasional large-scale events -- like blackouts -- remain possible.

Date: 2003-08-18 11:15 am (UTC)
mithriltabby: Serene silver tabby (Default)
From: [personal profile] mithriltabby
One plan I’ve seen is that once we have fuel cell vehicles that can quietly just start outputting electricity, people can plug their cars into the city grid and sell the energy at a time when energy is at a premium and you can then turn a small profit on the fuel and usage. There would be some additional infrastructure work to make this feasible— you’ll want your car to stop generating while you still have enough fuel to drive home, and when the profit of selling the electricity drops below a certain point— but it would be a great deal less expensive than getting the 1/3 extra capacity to the overall system. (Individuals could have the incentive to install it into their homes with “You can run your appliances during a blackout by plugging your fuel cell vehicle in to the wall.” Corporations might equip certain sections of their parking lots.)

Date: 2003-08-18 07:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] roaringmouse.livejournal.com
Oops happens. This has been a potential problem since the 1967(?)Blackout. I was in second grade.. Again, I am dating myself.

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated 2026-01-11 07:19 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios