mdlbear: (distress)

Welcome to the start of summer, and maybe of WWIII. This post that came across my Mastodon feed this morning kind of says it all:

You don't have to prefix things with "doom" anymore, that's just the default now. You can just say scrolling.

Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, ...

I had my oncology appointment; I'll be getting a hormone injection (tomorrow, and apparently they do house calls for that) rather than continuing with abiraterone (which insurance won't cover because not metastatic). It's good for six months, which will take me through the end of my 2-year course of treatment. I'm okay with this.

Last night I fell down a rabbit-hole troubleshooting my little script that prints out the URL of one's last post. See this commit. Pretty sure I can blame AI bots for that problem.

I fell down another rabbit-hole Friday, which started by looking for the overture to Wagner's opera Der fliegende Holländer. Turns out that J. Slauerhoff, whom our street is named after, wrote a poem about it. It's in his book, Eldorado. I expect to have a little fun trying to translate it. (And note in passing that doom is also mentioned in that connection.)

ysabetwordsmith has some good links about dealing with Heat. It was supposed to hit 30C (90F) today, but it looks like we may be getting a thunderstorm instead. It'll still be too hot indoors.

Notes & links, as usual )

mdlbear: "Sometimes it's better to light a flamethrower than to curse the darkness" - Terry Pratchett (flamethrower)
Tragedy:
A drama or literary work in which the main character is brought to ruin or suffers extreme sorrow, especially as a consequence of a tragic flaw, moral weakness, or inability to cope with unfavorable circumstances.
-- definition of tragedy by The Free Dictionary (emphasis mine)

I'm really not sure where to put the cut tag on this post. Today I'm talking about Deep Adaptation: A Map for Navigating Climate Tragedy [PDF], by Professor Jem Bendell. The author has a link to resources on emotional support in the sidebar of his home page. As I said back on Sunday, it's a pulling-no-punches prediction of the likely consequences of global warming.

Links and some commentary have been seen elsewhere on my DW reading list (fayanora, siliconshaman, ysabetwordsmith). [personal profile] ysabetwordsmith points out that Very little of this is actually new; what's new is that some people are actually listening this time.

It's pretty clear that the paper is an attempt to shock enough people into listening to make a difference. Um... is this the right place to mention that this is The Climate Change Paper So Depressing It's Sending People to Therapy? Probably.

Okay, I think that's enough of a warning. Please consider your headspace before proceeding, and maybe find a cat or a stuffie to hold, because it's that bad. We are very screwed. )

There's some support from this study, Deadly heatwaves could affect 74 percent of the world’s population (The paper is under a paywall, but the abstract is free.) The maps are frightening. That 74% figure is for 2100 if emissions continue to rise at their current rate. With "aggressive" reduction (and I don't know whether that means to zero emissions -- I doubt it) it's 48%. And see above about feedback. And don't forget Bitcoin!

The same group points out that Greenhouse gas [is] triggering more changes than we can handle because it's more than just heat waves -- there are other changes going on that are usually studied separately rather than together.

Scared yet? I don't know -- nobody knows, really -- whether Bendell's most extreme predictions are true, nor what the timescale will really turn out to be. The bottom line, though, is things are worse than most people think, and getting worse faster than anticipated in the studies that led to the 2-degree rise by 2100 target.

I don't profess to understand much of the "Deep Adaptation" section of the paper. It gets into politics, sociology, and psychology, none of which are my strong points. But the main point is that we need to make drastic changes at a societal level, based on the certainty that things will get worse, and the high probability that they will get much worse. We might be able to save civilization, if we can stop making things worse and adapt quickly enough to the changes we can't stop.

If we can't, well, at least the tardigrades will probably make it through. I'm not so sure about the cockroaches.

Most Popular Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Page generated 2026-01-05 01:43 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios