mdlbear: (spoiler)

So... here's an article on Gizmodo about How Much It Actually Costs to Publish an Ebook vs. a Real Book, based on Making the Case for iPad E-Book Prices at the New York Times.

Giz puts it all in a handy table -- I'll wait while you go and look -- that makes $13 for an ebook look like a fair deal compared to $26 for a hardcover. The publisher gets about the same amount in both cases. The bookseller -- Amazon, say -- gets $3.90 for the ebook, vs. $13 for the hardcover, which is fair because there's no inventory, floor space, or need to cover inventory that doesn't sell. The author gets a little less for the ebook: $3.25 vs $3.90. Printing, storage, and distribution for the hardback is only $3.25. Seems fair, right?

Not so fast.

Giz also says "There is no equivalent paperback market with lower costs to eke out more money later in a book's life (especially if the hardcover flops)." But isn't the ebook more like a paperback? The marginal cost of one more ebook is zero.

If you take out both the bookseller's and the publisher's cut from the ebook, you're down to a perfectly reasonable $4.53. That still includes $1.28 per copy for copyediting, design, and marketing. That means that an author who sells ebooks directly to the public can make money at a lower price.

And that, my children, is why crowdfunding works.

(I'm oversimplifying, of course. Unless you're already an established author or famous for some other reason, it's almost impossible to get your sales figures up to what a publisher could get for you. And so on. But the publishing industry still has to worry.)

Cross-posted to [livejournal.com profile] mdlbear and [livejournal.com profile] crowdfunding.

mdlbear: blue fractal bear with text "since 2002" (Default)

Google Print is finally online. There are some serious problems, and I'm not talking about the moronic legal threat from the publishers. First thing I did was to search for a poem ("The Stolen Child", by Yeats) that I know damned well is public domain -- it was first published in 1899. Back come a bunch of links to images -- not even text -- of the poem as typeset in books published between 1990 and 2002, watermarked "Copyrighted" (or something like that -- the server's down at the moment). An advanced search limiting the dates to 1800-1930 turns up nothing whatever.

Just typesetting the damned poem doesn't give you a copyright, you blithering greedy bastards! I'll wait for things to settle out, and meanwhile head back to the 16,000 public domain books at gutenberg.org.

mdlbear: blue fractal bear with text "since 2002" (Default)

Here's an article in Newsweek (from Debbie Ridpath Ohi, who gets a small mention in the antepenultimate paragraph) talking about the rise of self-publishing on the Web for musicians, artists, and writers. They don't mention software writers, but we've been doing it since before the web existed.

What's new is that the mainstream media are starting to notice, and it scares the heck out of them. For all the screams of "piracy!", what's really at stake here is their business model: nobody needs the big middlemen anymore, not for things like books and CDs. Big-budget items like movies, high-end computer games, and grand opera still need a producer to front a lot of cash, but even there the prime-time advertising and distribution are becoming less important. For every movie that makes it big on its first weekend there are many that might as well go straight to DVD. Some of them do, and that trend is only going to increase. Other big projects can be done collaboratively now. Look at Linux.

(I was going to have some clever conclusion here, but I've had so many interruptions over the last hour or so that my concentration is blown, and I need to get to the bank and then to work. More tomorrow, perhaps.)

Most Popular Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Page generated 2026-01-03 09:39 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios