Gadget lust
2007-08-21 09:05 pm Discussing the Zoom H4 in comments to this post by
catsittingstill, I realized that the soon-to-be-shipped H2 was a lot closer to what I really need for field recording.
Tomorrow I'm going to call and see whether it can record at 24 bits over
USB, but I don't think that's really a major consideration. When I
decided not to get the H4, the fact that I couldn't use it as a 24-bit USB
interface was the most important factor in the decision. (The
fact that it couldn't multitrack at 24 bits was minor, since I was already
using Audacity for that.) So I spent about the same amount of money on an
Edirol UA-25 (a USB-powered 24/96 interface with built-in preamps and
phantom power) and a Behringer C2 stereo pair. They work great, and saved
my arse recording a couple of
cflute's tracks for CC&S when my recording system's hard disk died. Couldn't
possibly have done that with the H4.
But now I have the UA-25 and the whole rig, though very useful, is bulky and takes half an hour to set up and tweak levels on. A small, self-contained, simple gadget with AGC is just the thing for most of what I'm currently doing at cons. And with the ability to record 4 channels it would allow me to capture audience reaction without compromising the performance sound -- something that the 2-channel UA-25 can't do at all.
The fact that it's $100 cheaper than the H4 doesn't hurt. I'll probably wait for reviews, but I strongly suspect that there's a Zoom H2 in my future.
Aug. 22 14:38 It can only send 2 channels x 16 bits over USB, but it can be powered from USB, meaning you can use a MintyBoost to extend your battery life.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 04:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 04:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 05:36 am (UTC)Harold
no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 06:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 03:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 09:48 pm (UTC)