mdlbear: (tsunami)
Reality Check | Ephraim Schwartz | InfoWorld | NBC doesn't own the Olympics, we do | August 9, 2008 06:46 AM | Ephraim Schwartz
To NBC, MSNBC, CNBC and other commercial broadcasters around the world I say, figure out another way to make money. The airwaves, the Internet airwaves at least, belong to us.

It wasn't the opening ceremonies at the Olympics that was thrilling but rather reading the accounts of the grass roots collaborative efforts of people around the world doing an end run around the commercial sites who claimed to own the rights to broadcast the event by sharing, often over YouTube, videos of the Games.

People were not content to watch a sanitized, tape delayed version of a major global event and when YouTube owners Google played the subservient pawn in NBC's commercial endeavors we witnessed new videos pop up just as fast as they could shut down the old. And when that didn’t work users were sharing links across Twitter and other collaborative sites.

The New York Times quoted Gary Zenkel, the president of NBC Olympics, as saying "we have a billion dollars worth of revenue at stake here, so that means we're not public television, for better or worse."

Well it is going to be worse.
mdlbear: blue fractal bear with text "since 2002" (Default)

This year, Time Magazine picks YOU as their person of the year. Mirror on the cover and everything. Right.

But look at 2006 through a different lens and you'll see another story, one that isn't about conflict or great men. It's a story about community and collaboration on a scale never seen before. It's about the cosmic compendium of knowledge Wikipedia and the million-channel people's network YouTube and the online metropolis MySpace. It's about the many wresting power from the few and helping one another for nothing and how that will not only change the world, but also change the way the world changes.

The tool that makes this possible is the World Wide Web. Not the Web that Tim Berners-Lee hacked together (15 years ago, according to Wikipedia) as a way for scientists to share research. It's not even the overhyped dotcom Web of the late 1990s. The new Web is a very different thing. It's a tool for bringing together the small contributions of millions of people and making them matter. Silicon Valley consultants call it Web 2.0, as if it were a new version of some old software. But it's really a revolution.

Here's some more from Reuters. Hard to tell whether this is because they really just noticed that the Internet is a communication and collaboration medium, or because they couldn't think of anyone who actually did something worthwhile this year.

mdlbear: blue fractal bear with text "since 2002" (Default)
The Register asks the perfectly reasonable question: Mass murder in the skies: was the plot feasible?

The answer, assuming triacetone triperoxide, is very clearly "no". Either we've been dealing with unbelievably stupid terrorist wannabes (always a distinct possibility), or some blatent misdirection.
mdlbear: blue fractal bear with text "since 2002" (Default)

...that the story about the student who was visited by the Feds after requesting a copy of Mao's little red book on interlibrary loan turns out to have been a hoax. Some people, including Gary McGath, spotted inconsistancies right away.

On the other hand, it's sad and appalling that we live in a country, and under a government, where it was easy to believe that it wasn't a hoax.

Most Popular Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Page generated 2025-06-17 08:20 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios