mdlbear: (ccs)
Like a fox, maybe
Wired is running a couple of stories involving well-known musician David Byrne. The first is an interview with Thom Yorke from Radiohead, where he confirms what a huge success the "name your own price" offering was, contrary to CNN's editors calling it dumb. According to Yorke: "In terms of digital income, we've made more money out of this record than out of all the other Radiohead albums put together, forever." Yorke also confirms other things that we've said about new business models, where touring can be a big part of the model (contrary to people who insist that's impossible). Yorke notes: "at the moment we make money principally from touring."
Should I put a "name your own price" button on my downloads? What you pay for an album's worth of MP3's? How about a track? How about a track you could re-mix yourself? Inquiring minds...
mdlbear: (sureal time)
Freedom to Tinker » Blog Archive » Infinite Storage for Music
Last week I spoke on a panel called “The Paradise of Infinite Storage”, at the “Pop [Music] and Policy” conference at McGill University in Montreal. The panel’s title referred to an interesting fact: sometime in the next decade, we’ll see a $100 device that fits in your pocket and holds all of the music ever recorded by humanity.

This is a simple consequence of Moore’s Law which, in one of its variants, holds that the amount of data storage available at a fixed size and price roughly doubles every eighteen months. Extrapolate that trend and, depending on your precise assumptions, you’ll find the magic date falls somewhere between 2011 and 2019. From then on, storage capacity might as well be infinite, at least as far as music is concerned.

This has at least two important consequences. First, it strains even further the economics of the traditional music business. The gap between the number of songs you might want to listen to, and the number you’re willing and able to pay a dollar each to buy, is growing ever wider. In a world of infinite storage you’ll be able to keep around a huge amount of music that is potentially interesting but not worth a dollar (or even a dime) to you yet. So why not pay a flat fee to buy access to everything?

Second, infinite storage will enable new ways of building filesharing technologies, which will be much harder for copyright owners to fight.
Discuss.

I just realized I need a Klein bottle icon.
mdlbear: blue fractal bear with text "since 2002" (Default)
Rick Rubin - Recording Industry - Rock Music - New York Times
Rubin [the new head of Columbia Records] has a bigger idea. To combat the devastating impact of file sharing, he, like others in the music business (Doug Morris and Jimmy Iovine at Universal, for instance), says that the future of the industry is a subscription model, much like paid cable on a television set. "You would subscribe to music," Rubin explained, as he settled on the velvet couch in his library. "You'd pay, say, $19.95 a month, and the music will come anywhere you'd like. In this new world, there will be a virtual library that will be accessible from your car, from your cellphone, from your computer, from your television. Anywhere. The iPod will be obsolete, but there would be a Walkman-like device you could plug into speakers at home. You'll say, 'Today I want to listen to ... Simon and Garfunkel,' and there they are. The service can have demos, bootlegs, concerts, whatever context the artist wants to put out. And once that model is put into place, the industry will grow 10 times the size it is now."

From Napster to the iPod, the music business has been wrong about how much it can dictate to its audience. "Steve Jobs understood Napster better than the record business did," David Geffen told me. "IPods made it easy for people to share music, and Apple took a big percentage of the business that once belonged to the record companies. The subscription model is the only way to save the music business. If music is easily available at a price of five or six dollars a month, then nobody will steal it."

For this model to be effective, all the record companies will have to agree. "It's like getting the heads of the five families together," said Mark DiDia, referencing "The Godfather." "It will be very difficult, but what else are we going to do?"

Rubin sees no other solution. "Either all the record companies will get together or the industry will fall apart and someone like Microsoft will come in and buy one of the companies at wholesale and do what needs to be done," he said. "The future technology companies will either wait for the record companies to smarten up, or they'll let them sink until they can buy them for 10 cents on the dollar and own the whole thing."
As usual, I'm pretty sure this is part of the answer, but not the whole answer. If you have to subscribe, how does that get enforced? How does anyone know whether you're a subscriber when they hand you a URL? How does anyone know that the URL points to music?

The only thing that makes sense is to bundle the price into everybody's ISP fees, exactly the kind of surcharge that many countries now add to recording media.

I've been down this road before.
mdlbear: portrait of me holding a guitar, by Kelly Freas (freas)
Techdirt: Musicians Realizing That Access Is A Key Selling Point
While I've been writing this series of posts about the economic models involving non-scarce things like content and ideas, a key element of understanding the business models that come out of this is recognizing that a key, scarce component is access to the musician. Clive Thompson has written up a great article for the NY Times Magazines about how new musicians are discovering the two sides of this coin. Basically, they've learned that the internet and the ability to communicate with fans is a key element in allowing them to be successful in the first place. That is, it's that ability to go straight to the fans that allows them to have a music career at all. I particularly like the one musician who strategically tours by using his online presence to figure out if over 100 fans will show up at any particular venue -- and then will make plans to perform there. Nearly all of the musicians being profiled probably wouldn't be nearly as successful without their online presence, without promoting their music for free, without asking others to help them promote their music for them -- and without being around and being accessible to fans.
The New York Times article features Jonathan Coulton. The series of articles in TechDirt has been very instructive about the economics of non-scarce goods, and how to construct a viable business model that uses them to increase the value and profitability of traditional, scarce goods. This one and the NYT article have been particularly inspiring, but I'm not about to quit my day job just yet.
mdlbear: (barcode)
Big labels are f*cked, and DRM is dead - Peter Jenner | The Register
Interview Few people know the music industry better than Peter Jenner. Pink Floyd's first manager, who subsequently managed Syd Barrett's solo career, Jenner has also looked after T.Rex, The Clash, Ian Dury, Disposable Heroes and Billy Bragg - who he manages today. He's also secretary general of the International Music Managers Forum.

And he doesn't pull his punches.

The major four music labels today are "fucked", he says. Digital music pricing has been a scam where the consumer pays for manufacturing, distribution, and does all the work - and still has to pay more. Labels should outsource everything except finance and licensing.
mdlbear: blue fractal bear with text "since 2002" (Default)

Techdirt: More And More Musicians Seem To Get It

One of the encouraging things over the past couple of years has been the increasing number of artists who do seem to get digital technologies, and figure out ways to embrace them. From Maria Schneider to Pearl Jam to the String Cheese Incident we've tried to highlight artists who have learned to treat fans like fans, rather than criminals.

There are also lots of resources, including a legal guide, at Fair Use Network. (Links from the EFF's miniLinks page.)

mdlbear: (sony)

Weird Al Yankovic Says Digital Is a Raw Deal For Some Artists - The Digital Music Weblog

King of comic rock, Weird Al Yankovic says digital is a raw deal for artists like himself. When asked by a fan whether purchasing a conventional CD or buying a digital file via iTunes would net Yankovic more pocket money the artist answered on his website.

"I am extremely grateful for your support, no matter which format you choose to legally obtain my music in, so you should do whatever makes the most sense for you personally. But since you ASKED... I actually do get significantly more money from CD sales, as opposed to downloads. This is the one thing about my renegotiated record contract that never made much sense to me. It costs the label NOTHING for somebody to download an album (no manufacturing costs, shipping, or really any overhead of any kind) and yet the artist (me) winds up making less from it. Go figure."

The article goes on to explain that Apple pays, not Weird Al, but his publisher; they in turn pass a pittance on to Al -- significantly less than the mechanical license fee that he gets for a CD, which isn't much to begin with. Some of the comments (after you filter out the flames) go into even more detail.

It's worth noting that the economics change considerably if you're not going through a record label. In that case, you own not only the copyright on the songs, but the copyright on the performance, which is where the label is taking its huge cut. <

The Truth: Recording Music is Basically Free (posted a few days ago by Shane Workman of Syrius Jones) goes perhaps a little too far towards doing it all yourself, but all their music is under a Creative Commons license and they don't seem to be losing money.

Overall, technology has changed the economics of the music industry. Music is now cheap to record and free to acquire. Ignoring this point is just insane. If the music is good, people will come to the shows and we’ll make enough money to keep doing this.

mdlbear: blue fractal bear with text "since 2002" (Default)

OK, I already knew I'm an idiot -- I don't have to be reminded. As it turns out, my copy of The Folksinger's Guitar Guide (long out of print, not sold in stores, and which I've been searching the house for for over a year now, on and off) has been sitting on a shelf in my bedroom all this time. The same shelf where I used to keep my filk binder, as a matter of fact.

Dumb bear.

By the way, when did music publishers start intimidating stores into refusing to sell used books? They won't even take returns, it seems. Those eyetracks just destroy the resale value, you know...

mdlbear: (hacker glider)

Sony's DRM-enforcing rootkit apparently includes the LAME MP3 library, which is published under the LGPL. (A blog article can be found here) So not only do their CDs illegally trespass on your PC, but they violate LAME's copyright at the same time (by failing to make the source available)!

mdlbear: blue fractal bear with text "since 2002" (Default)

In the face of well-deserved adverse publicity over its DRM rootkit, Sony is offering a patch that reveals the hidden files. Of course, you still break your CD drivers if you try to remove it. Here's a reasonably well-balanced article (from the Washington Post).

In response to criticisms that intruders could take such advantage, First4Internet Ltd. -- the British company that developed the software -- will make available on its Web site a software patch that should remove its ability to hide files, chief executive Mathew Gilliat-Smith said.

Russinovich called the offer of a patch "backpedaling and damage control in the face of a public-relations nightmare" and emphasized that users who try to remove the files manually after applying the fix will still ruin their CD-Rom drives.

...

But according to Mikko Hypponen, director of research for Finnish antivirus company F-Secure Corp., users who want to remove the program may not do so directly, but must fill out a form on Sony's Web site, download additional software, wait for a phone call from a technical support specialist, and then download and install yet another program that removes the files.

I'd like to think that what we're seeing is the beginning of a popular revolt against the {music, movie} industry, that would end up with real reforms in the copyright and patent laws. But I don't believe it. Politicians listen to corporations with the money to hire lobbyists; common sense has nothing to do with it. But I do think that we're going to see a two-tiered system, with a small walled ghetto of high volume, high profit, corporate-published works, and a much larger web of freely-traded pro-am and amateur works under licences like the GPL and Creative Commons.

mdlbear: blue fractal bear with text "since 2002" (Default)

F-Secure's description and blog posting. Note that, according to this posting, this is an independent confirmation of Mark Russinovich's analysis that I posted about yesterday and the day before.

(From [livejournal.com profile] autographedcat.)

mdlbear: portrait of me holding a guitar, by Kelly Freas (freas)

Brian Krebs. (From DocBug)

A comment on Krebs' blog post contains a link to Sony Music's feedback form: <www.sonymusic.com/about/feedback.cgi>; so I used it:

I was all set to buy another pair of Sony's excellent MDR 7509 professional headphones. Now that I've learned that Sony CDs install a Windows rootkit when you attempt to play them, I've decided to look for an alternative, from a company that does not illegally install unwanted software on its customers' computers.

And you can forget about selling me music. As an independent singer-songwriter who believes in fair use and the power of word-of-mouth advertising, I will continue to buy my CDs from my fellow musicians, and not from soulless, evil companies like Sony.

mdlbear: blue fractal bear with text "since 2002" (Default)

Slashdot and BoingBoing both point to this article dissecting the rootkit that Sony installs in the name of DRM on their recent audio CDs. It hides registry entries and processes, and hooks into drivers and system calls, and creates a hidden directory. It's a rootkit -- one of the nastiest forms of malware out there.

It'll be a cold day in Hell the next time I buy a Sony product. Too bad for them; I was thinking of getting another pair of headphones. Anybody know of something roughly equivalent to the Sony MDR 7509's?

Most Popular Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Page generated 2025-06-12 12:26 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios