mdlbear: (hacker glider)

Lots of tasty link sausage this morning:

For the cloud skeptics and former Sidekick (l)users, a good opinion piece:

Some argued with me last night that cloud computing is perfectly safe, it's the company deploying that you need to look to. OK. I accept that. Only thing is that Danger's been doing this pretty well since 2002 and at no point did I ever see a single warning from anyone that dealing with T-Mobile, Danger or Microsoft might be a bad idea when it comes to personal data solely living in the cloud.

My real question is how much is your data worth? Not the cost of the data streams you pay each month, but how much value does your data have to you personally? Recently, when I visited a client, I was asked to check my laptop at the door and I was asked how much my computer was worth. The guard was somewhat surprised at my stated value of my system. "Is this computer really worth a two million dollars?" he asked. "No," I replied. However, the information on it is worth that and perhaps more to me. Could you re-create every document or email you've ever written? Re-acquire every song in your collection or re-take every photograph in your catalog. Perhaps you could, but even if so, at what cost and what effort?

For the furries reading this, a robotic tail. Here's another article.

For the filk videographers, the Zoom H2 is now available almost everywhere for $250. Must... not... click... buy... button...

For those of you who are worried that the publishing industry may go the way of the music industry, here's more to worry about. Probably 99% of my reading is on the web these days, so, yeah.

... And here's an article on file-sharing sites teaming up to promite indie films.

mdlbear: (gates-pirate)

Here's an AppleInsider article that claims to have information from inside Danger and Microsoft.

Additional insiders have stepped forward to shed more light into Microsoft's troubled acquisition of Danger, its beleaguered Pink Project, and what has become one of the most high profile Information Technology disasters in recent memory.

The sources point to longstanding management issues, a culture of "dogfooding" (to eradicate any vestiges of competitor's technologies after an acquisition), and evidence that could suggest the failure was the result of a deliberate act of sabotage.

Hanlon's Razor still applies, though; stupidity is more likely than sabotage in my opinion.

mdlbear: (gates-pirate)

More links on the T-Mobile/Sidekick disaster.

This article on Engadget is probably the best of the lot -- it blames it on Microsoft outsourcing an upgrade to the storage-area network without making a backup first. You would think... And there may be another disaster in the making, if their $50 all-you-can-eat plan comes out and people who haven't learned from the Sidekick debacle (or know how to run rsync on their Android phones) pile on and suck up all their bandwidth.

And here's Gizmodo saying that, whatever you may have heard from T-Mobile, your data is probably G O N E.

Good luck.

mdlbear: blue fractal bear with text "since 2002" (Default)
Al-Qaida or your appendix?
Wired News: One Million Ways to Die
Comparing official mortality data with the number of Americans who have been killed inside the United States by terrorism since the 1995 bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma reveals that scores of threats are far more likely to kill an American than any terrorist -- at least, statistically speaking.

In fact, your appendix is more likely to kill you than al-Qaida is.

With that in mind, here's a handy ranking of the various dangers confronting America, based on the number of mortalities in each category throughout the 11-year period spanning 1995 through 2005 (extrapolated from best available data).
cut to take less vertical space -- it's a table, so bandwidth isn't an issue )
(from BoingBoing)

Most Popular Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Page generated 2025-05-25 09:43 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios