Google uses an unreliable bot to determine what documents are "appropriate" to share.
Yeah, I have my websites on a hosting service. But I have the master copy at home.
Google uses an unreliable bot to determine what documents are "appropriate" to share.
Yeah, I have my websites on a hosting service. But I have the master copy at home.
Lots of tasty link sausage this morning:
For the cloud skeptics and former Sidekick (l)users, a good opinion piece:
Some argued with me last night that cloud computing is perfectly safe, it's the company deploying that you need to look to. OK. I accept that. Only thing is that Danger's been doing this pretty well since 2002 and at no point did I ever see a single warning from anyone that dealing with T-Mobile, Danger or Microsoft might be a bad idea when it comes to personal data solely living in the cloud.
My real question is how much is your data worth? Not the cost of the data streams you pay each month, but how much value does your data have to you personally? Recently, when I visited a client, I was asked to check my laptop at the door and I was asked how much my computer was worth. The guard was somewhat surprised at my stated value of my system. "Is this computer really worth a two million dollars?" he asked. "No," I replied. However, the information on it is worth that and perhaps more to me. Could you re-create every document or email you've ever written? Re-acquire every song in your collection or re-take every photograph in your catalog. Perhaps you could, but even if so, at what cost and what effort?
For the furries reading this, a robotic tail. Here's another article.
For the filk videographers, the Zoom H2 is now available almost everywhere for $250. Must... not... click... buy... button...
For those of you who are worried that the publishing industry may go the way of the music industry, here's more to worry about. Probably 99% of my reading is on the web these days, so, yeah.
... And here's an article on file-sharing sites teaming up to promite indie films.
Here's an AppleInsider article that claims to have information from inside Danger and Microsoft.
Additional insiders have stepped forward to shed more light into Microsoft's troubled acquisition of Danger, its beleaguered Pink Project, and what has become one of the most high profile Information Technology disasters in recent memory.
The sources point to longstanding management issues, a culture of "dogfooding" (to eradicate any vestiges of competitor's technologies after an acquisition), and evidence that could suggest the failure was the result of a deliberate act of sabotage.
Hanlon's Razor still applies, though; stupidity is more likely than sabotage in my opinion.
More links on the T-Mobile/Sidekick disaster.
This article on Engadget is probably the best of the lot -- it blames
it on Microsoft outsourcing an upgrade to the storage-area network without
making a backup first. You would think... And there may be another
disaster in the making, if their $50 all-you-can-eat plan comes out and people who haven't learned
from the Sidekick debacle (or know how to run rsync
on their
Android phones) pile on and suck up all their bandwidth.
And here's Gizmodo saying that, whatever you may have heard from T-Mobile, your data is probably G O N E.
Good luck.
Just in case anyone still thinks that letting a third party control your data is a good idea, here's T-Mobile telling Sidekick users that their data has all been lost. If you have a Sidekick, don't turn it off!
I just love the fact that the company that developed the Sidekick is called Danger. And that they were bought by Microsoft.
Have a nice day.
From this post by
tagryn, a cautionary tale of the of relying on third-parties
to store your important files and email: When Google Owns
You.
One of my coworkers had an equally bad experience with Netscape Calendar: one day it was just gone. Not only had they cancelled the service, but they'd deleted all the user data. They had been careful not to tell their customers of this plan, because they "didn't want anyone to complain."
I'd been contemplating switching some of my domains over to Google for email -- Dreamhost makes it easy to set that up. Maybe not.
Yeah, almost all of my websites are third-party-hosted now. But the hosts are nothing but a mirror for the various internal working directories. And they're going to stay that way. If I can figure out how to do that with some Google's services, I may consider using a few of them.