June 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 302025

Page Summary

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
mdlbear: blue fractal bear with text "since 2002" (Default)
Why I Support Barack Obama - O'Reilly Radar
We are in unprecedented times. And folks, I'm sorry to say that the current financial meltdown is not the worst of it. Political instability around the world, wars over access to resources, and yes, terrorists, are all in our future. Scientists who've studied global warming agree that we're heading towards decades of extreme environmental stress, leading to even more severe economic disruptions than we have seen to date. Meanwhile, we have an aging population with ballooning healthcare costs, an unfair economy in which some people receive outsized gains while others fall behind, an educational system that is not preparing children for the future, and deficits that require an increasing percentage of our tax dollars to service debt to other countries. Even if there is a short term recovery, huge problems loom in the years ahead, problems we can no longer pass off to our children and grandchildren.

Faced with these problems, we need a president who can harness the best and brightest our country has to offer, a president who is conversant with, and comfortable with, the power of technology to assist in solving these problems, a president who is good at listening, studying, and devising solutions based on the best insight available, rather than on narrow ideology. We need a president who can forge consensus, not just among the partisans in our own fractured democracy but around the world. We need a president who can inspire our citizens and our global partners to forgo narrow self interest and embrace the possibilities that we can achieve if we work together to build a better future.

I believe Barack Obama is that president. He is a man of intelligence, but also a man whose character and temperament seem suited to the problems of our age: unflappable, optimistic even in the face of adversity, willing to speak the truth about subjects that have long been taboo (I'm thinking of his speech on race, and his speech on fatherhood) and with unscripted reactions that show his fundamental decency (I'm thinking of his reaction to those who wanted to make a campaign issue of Sarah Palin's daughter's unplanned pregnancy.)

Because this is a tech blog, not a political blog, though, I primarily want to address the subject of why members of the technical community should join me in supporting Barack Obama. (The New York Times has made a compelling case based on the broader issues, as has Colin Powell.) I outline four principal reasons:

1. Connected, Transparent Government
2. The Financial Crisis
3. Climate Change
4. Net Neutrality
mdlbear: (distress)

Copy this sentence into your livejournal if you're in a non-same-sex marriage, and you don't want it "protected" by the bigots who think that gay marriage hurts it somehow.

(seen several places this morning)

mdlbear: (xkcd-boomdeyada)
How do you document real life? - Hey there, Joe Six-Pack
Sarah Palin et al like to call us "Joe Six-Pack," and they think we like it too. They think it sounds folksy and homey and cute.

Sure. It's a folksy, homey, cute way to euphemistically call us something very close to trashy, ignorant hillbillies. We're just not supposed to be smart enough to realize it.
Referred from a locked post, but this is intelligent, thoughtful, uplifting, and [livejournal.com profile] copperwise is just fscking amazing.
mdlbear: (hacker glider)
Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. - NYTimes.com
“Since passage of the Patriot Act, many companies based outside of the United States have been reluctant to store client information in the U.S.,” said Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center in Washington. “There is an ongoing concern that U.S. intelligence agencies will gather this information without legal process. There is particular sensitivity about access to financial information as well as communications and Internet traffic that goes through U.S. switches.”

But economics also plays a role. Almost all nations see data networks as essential to economic development. “It’s no different than any other infrastructure that a country needs,” said K C Claffy, a research scientist at the Cooperative Association for Internet Data Analysis in San Diego. “You wouldn’t want someone owning your roads either.”

Indeed, more countries are becoming aware of how their dependence on other countries for their Internet traffic makes them vulnerable. Because of tariffs, pricing anomalies and even corporate cultures, Internet providers will often not exchange data with their local competitors. They prefer instead to send and receive traffic with larger international Internet service providers.
(From [livejournal.com profile] cryptome.)

Not surprising.
mdlbear: (distress)
Close the Loopholes - On July 17 We Take Back the Economy!
Buyout firms such as Kohlberg, Kravis and Roberts have made billions of dollars using special tax breaks that reward them for buying and selling companies; and they’ve slashed wages and destroyed jobs all while using tax loopholes to pay an even lower tax rate than everyday Americans on their billion-dollar profits. On July 17, in cities from New York to Bangalore to Paris, SEIU members will be joined by activists from 25 countries to take aim at the special perks and tax loopholes that buyout firms depend on to get rich.

There is legislation in the U.S. Senate to close the loopholes that would provide money for tax relief for middle income taxpayers and fund healthcare. The buyout industry has spent millions to defeat this legislation.
I'm a little embarrassed to say that I got this link from our building manager -- I work just down the street from the main target's HQ.

Particularly apropos in view of parts of my previous post, don't you think?
mdlbear: (distress)

I want my country back, and the only way to get it back is to vote for a Democrat in every damned election I'm qualified to vote in.

The Department of Health & Human Services moves to define "contraception" as "abortion".

I live in California. Our initiative process has made it entirely clear that any small, cynical group of greedy bastards can cobble together enough special-interest votes to get almost any hare-brained scheme that benefits them passed by a simple majority. The Bush administration and their puppet masters have done that on an even larger scale; the entire Republican party has been turned over to the religious right as a way of keeping a small group of extremely rich, extremely cynical people in power. This latest move is a blatent attempt to drag mainstream Catholics into the conspiracy, and it may very well succeed.

One more term with a Republican in office, and there will be a right-wing nutcase majority on the US Supreme Court. DO YOU WANT THAT? If you have to think hard about it, I'm not sure I want to know.

A little history. Cut-tagged for strong language and graphic descriptions of violence toward women and minorities. )

I am old enough to remember people driving across state lines to get abortions. To buy contraceptives. DO YOU WANT THOSE DAYS BACK?

I am old enough to remember when Jews and Catholics, as well as African-Americans (as we call them now) were routinely discriminated against in jobs, housing, and college admissions. When restrooms, drinking fountains, and schools were segregated. When Jewish kids like me were routinely teased -- if not worse -- at school. DO YOU WANT THOSE DAYS BACK?

I am old enough to remember when a divorced-and-remarried relative couldn't go back home to Italy for fear of being arrested for bigamy, because divorce wasn't legal there. DO YOU WANT THAT HERE?

Think about whether you want the bad old days back before you vote Republican, because that's what you're going to get, and worse. Much worse.

We are one Supreme Court justice away from a right-wing religious dictatorship. If that. It may already be too late, because the ones pulling the puppet strings aren't necessarily tied to the religious right. That's just where they can get the votes now. If that coalition falls apart, they'll start to cobble together a different set of single issues. We may only have one or two terms to root them out. They already have a head start.

I am also old enough to remember when Richard Nixon was considered by many to be a corrupt right-wing nut case, and to remember that he was somewhere to the left of most of today's Democrats. I am old enough to remember when "liberal" was considered middle-of-the-road. I am old enough to have been proud to call myself a radical.

I am old enough to remember when the US had a middle class. When most rich people paid their fair share of taxes. When we learned the Bill of Rights in school, and knew that our government was there to enforce it and not to undermine it.

I am old enough to have learned the Pledge of Allegiance before a Republican administration added the words "under God" to it, and I still say it as I learned it.

DAMN IT, I WANT MY COUNTRY BACK!

Thanks to this post by [livejournal.com profile] snobahr, this post by [livejournal.com profile] kyburg, and this post by [livejournal.com profile] ravan. Planned Parenthood has an online petition.

mdlbear: blue fractal bear with text "since 2002" (Default)

Jesse Helms is dead!

Not to speak ill of the dead, or anything. Guess I'll just stop here.

mdlbear: blue fractal bear with text "since 2002" (Default)

The morning was almost entirely eaten up taking [livejournal.com profile] chaoswolf and [livejournal.com profile] selkit to the bank so they could set up a joint account. The bank we've been using since before we were married, Union Bank of California, is one of the few with a branch in Canada, which made it an obvious choice as well as convenient for all. It still took two hours for them to figure out how to handle a Canadian's identity. Feh!

After that, we piled the whole gang plus the wheelchair (Igor), into the [livejournal.com profile] flower_cat's minivan (the Rambling Silver Rose -- yes, the song was an afterthought) and went to the local Greek Orthodox church's Greek Festival. It's not about the music, the dancing, or the hucksters: it's about the food. Everyone in the family has something they like there, even the normally-super-picky Younger Daughter, who invariably has the deep-fried squid strips and a big box of honey-dipped, deep-fried dough balls for desert. Colleen had lamb, and I had a skewer of pork cubes; both of us drank retsina. Yum. The Cat and I finished lunch with Greek coffee (sometimes described as caffeinated sludge served in tiny cups at knife-point) and baklava.

Went over to the stage, and I joined a line dancing a Syrtos. Took a while for the pattern to come back to my feet, but I eventually got it. Left after that because the music really was a bit too loud. No walkies, but I got my exercise with the RollyCat. I'd parked only a couple of blocks away, so it wasn't worthwhile going around for a pickup.

After that, I took [livejournal.com profile] selkit to Fry's to exchange the Fujitsu tablet laptop he'd bought back in March, and which has been giving him considerable trouble, for a new Sony. Tedious but straightforward; I got a smile out of the salesdroid by mentioning to Selkit that one of the reasons I really like Fry's is their return policy.

Welsh rabbit (yes, that's really what it's called, not "rarebit" -- hint: it's an English dish) for a quick, light dinner.

After dinner the Cat, Emmy and I got dressed up and went out to the Mountain View Masonic Center for the installation of the Y.D.'s best friend Kaylee as Worthy Advisor of the local Rainbow Girls assembly. Needless to say, this was far, far outside my experience, or Emmy's for that matter. (Colleen had been to one, four decades ago.) K. seemed a little surprised, but delighted, to see us (it was her Mom who had given us the invitation). But, you know, you have to support your friends.

I found it fascinating. Girls in long dresses floating in precise patterns across the floor, simple but effective ritual hand-offs from the old officers to the new, a little bit of ad-hoc silliness to lighten things up... Light reception afterwards -- we came home with a plate of cucumber sandwiches. Emmy's sotto voce remark was that it was too religious for her -- too explicitly Christian, in fact; she described herself on the way home as "spiritual but not religious". It's a part of her friend's life that she's never going to share to any great extent, but we were all glad to have been there.

I said the Pledge of Allegiance as I originally learned it, without "under God". It's a small protest, but I do it anyway.

mdlbear: blue fractal bear with text "since 2002" (Default)

There are some crimes that are universally condemned in the civilized world. Murder. Slavery. Torture. Terrorism. Genocide. Sometimes one has to condone one evil in order to prevent a greater one; most civilized countries have standing armies, and some conscript their citizens into them. All civilized countries draw the line at torture.

There are several reasons for this, besides the obvious fact that history has proven time after time that it does not work: the "information" one obtains from a person who is give it in order to stop intolerable pain is likely to be of little value. Likely, even, to be deliberately misleading. But the chief reason has to be that it's evil. Like Sauron's ring, it corrupts any person, any organization, any nation that uses it. Like other great crimes, torture cuts the perpetrator off from civilization. From humanity.

It's possible to construct a "ticking time bomb" scenario in which torture is the only possible way to get some necessary, vital bit of information needed to prevent a greater crime. Fine. Leave the law on the books. If somebody is willing to break that law, in public, with all the records on video, and put their career, their reputation, and their life on the line in front of a jury of their peers, I'll grant them the right to try it.

If they're not willing to pay that very personal price, if they want to warp the law to let them get away with unspecified acts in secret that, when found out, do untold damage to their country's reputation in the civilized world, well, that's a crime, too. It's called treason.

Just as an aside, you'll find some other blog entries more-or-less aligned with my point of view here, here, and here. Opposing view here.

Oh, and the title? It's what Gandhi said when asked what he thought of Western civilization. I'd really like to be living in a civilized country again.

mdlbear: (distress)

... and keepin' old Cheney down (with apologies to Phil Ochs). But I couldn't resist, now that Chris Dodd (D-CT) has succeeded in stopping the FISA bill with its retroactive immunity for telco wiretapping.

It'll be back in January, but that's a whole new year, and a few more senators may be thinking about how it will look on their record.

mdlbear: (distress)
...on the other side, that is...

US says it has right to kidnap British citizens - Times Online
AMERICA has told Britain that it can “kidnap” British citizens if they are wanted for crimes in the United States.

A senior lawyer for the American government has told the Court of Appeal in London that kidnapping foreign citizens is permissible under American law because the US Supreme Court has sanctioned it.

The admission will alarm the British business community after the case of the so-called NatWest Three, bankers who were extradited to America on fraud charges. More than a dozen other British executives, including senior managers at British Airways and BAE Systems, are under investigation by the US authorities and could face criminal charges in America.

Until now it was commonly assumed that US law permitted kidnapping only in the “extraordinary rendition” of terrorist suspects.

The American government has for the first time made it clear in a British court that the law applies to anyone, British or otherwise, suspected of a crime by Washington.
(From this post by [livejournal.com profile] wcg.)
mdlbear: (distress)
Guardian | Fascist America, in 10 easy steps
From Hitler to Pinochet and beyond, history shows there are certain steps that any would-be dictator must take to destroy constitutional freedoms. And, argues Naomi Wolf, George Bush and his administration seem to be taking them all.

Naomi Wolf
Tuesday April 24, 2007
Guardian


Last autumn, there was a military coup in Thailand. The leaders of the coup took a number of steps, rather systematically, as if they had a shopping list. In a sense, they did. Within a matter of days, democracy had been closed down: the coup leaders declared martial law, sent armed soldiers into residential areas, took over radio and TV stations, issued restrictions on the press, tightened some limits on travel, and took certain activists into custody.

They were not figuring these things out as they went along. If you look at history, you can see that there is essentially a blueprint for turning an open society into a dictatorship. That blueprint has been used again and again in more and less bloody, more and less terrifying ways. But it is always effective. It is very difficult and arduous to create and sustain a democracy - but history shows that closing one down is much simpler. You simply have to be willing to take the 10 steps.

As difficult as this is to contemplate, it is clear, if you are willing to look, that each of these 10 steps has already been initiated today in the United States by the Bush administration.

Because Americans like me were born in freedom, we have a hard time even considering that it is possible for us to become as unfree - domestically - as many other nations. Because we no longer learn much about our rights or our system of government - the task of being aware of the constitution has been outsourced from citizens' ownership to being the domain of professionals such as lawyers and professors - we scarcely recognise the checks and balances that the founders put in place, even as they are being systematically dismantled. Because we don't learn much about European history, the setting up of a department of "homeland" security - remember who else was keen on the word "homeland" - didn't raise the alarm bells it might have.

It is my argument that, beneath our very noses, George Bush and his administration are using time-tested tactics to close down an open society. It is time for us to be willing to think the unthinkable - as the author and political journalist Joe Conason, has put it, that it can happen here. And that we are further along than we realise.
Got this from the lovely, talented, and normally mild-mannered [livejournal.com profile] vixyish. It was sort of apparent, but I haven't seen the steps set out this clearly before. The book referenced in the article, The End of America: A Letter of Warning to a Young Patriot, was published last month and is available here.

So I don't want to invoke Godwin's Law here, but rather the reverse. So with a little prodding from [livejournal.com profile] technoshaman, here's what Vixy says at the end of her post:
But not long ago, in a conversation about this kind of thing with a co-worker who follows news & politics pretty heavily, I asked him rather bleakly, "what can we do?"

He said, "Keep talking about it."
So I'm talking about it. Your turn.
mdlbear: (abt)
Techdirt: Court Slaps Down Software And Business Model Patents
This case involved a guy who was trying to patent the concept of "mandatory arbitration involving legal documents." The USPTO denied the patent. After a failed appeal, the guy went to court, and CAFC is also saying that his concept does not deserve patent protection, with this being the key quote: "The routine addition of modern electronics to an otherwise unpatentable invention typically creates a prima facie case of obviousness." In other words, simply taking a common process and automating it on a computer should be considered obvious -- and thus, not patentable. This doesn't rule out business model or software patents by any means -- but it at least suggests that the courts are beginning to recognize that the patent system has gone out of control. The court also specifically addresses its own earlier State Street decision, suggesting that people had been misinterpreting it to mean any business model was patentable -- when the USPTO and the courts should still be applying the same tests to see if the business models are patentable. It then notes that a business model on its own shouldn't be patentable unless it's tied to some sort of product, and then states: "It is thus clear that the present statute does not allow patents to be issued on particular business systems -- such as a particular type of arbitration -- that depend entirely on the use of mental processes."
(Emphasis added.)
mdlbear: blue fractal bear with text "since 2002" (Default)
OMG! Navy Calls MySpace Kids "Alien Life Force" (And They Hate the War, Too)
The MySpace generation is a "somewhat alien life force," a Navy recruiting presentation contends -- with a language and lifestyle that's almost unrecognizable to adults. And because the kids are such "coddled," "narcissistic praise junkies," they'll be beyond tough to bring into the military. Propensity to join the armed forces among these so-called "millennials" has dropped to as little as 3%; that's down from 26% in 2001.

Entropic Memes uncovered the bleak, often unintentionally hilarious report from the Annual Navy Workforce Research and Analysis Conference, which also glumly notes that the Iraq war has brutalized recruiting efforts. Up to two-thirds of millennials are "less likely to join the military" because of the war, according to the presentation.
(From BoingBoing.)

To answer the question in my title, "not much." The Iraq war means that the military can no longer pretend to be merely a place to work with good pay, on-the-job training, and benefits. The GI Bill, that put my Dad through grad school at Columbia, has been gutted to the point where it can hardly pay for four years at a state college. And you might actually be shipped off to someplace unpleasant for an interminable war that was started under false pretenses by Bush and his gang of greedy, cynical sycophants handlers puppet masters.

I could say something about the Vietnam here, but I think I'll pass except to say that they'll probably have to bring back the draft if they want to get us into another war any time soon.
mdlbear: blue fractal bear with text "since 2002" (Default)
CONELRAD | DAISY: THE COMPLETE HISTORY OF AN INFAMOUS AND ICONIC AD - PART ONE
Every election season when politicians unleash their expensive and (usually) unimaginative attack ads, op-ed writers invoke the unofficial title of the most notorious 60 seconds in advertising history: "The Daisy Ad" (official title: "Peace, Little Girl," aka "Daisy Girl," "The Daisy Spot, "aka "Little Girl – Countdown"). The spot features a little girl picking petals off of a daisy in a field and counting out of sequence just before an adult voiceover interjects a "military" countdown which is then followed by stock footage of a nuclear explosion and the cautionary words of President Lyndon B. Johnson: "These are the stakes – to make a world in which all of God's children can live, or to go into the dark. We must either love each other, or we must die." The ad – which never identifies its target – was aimed at reinforcing the perception that the 1964 Republican candidate for president, Senator Barry M. Goldwater, could not be trusted with his finger on the button. Title screen from 'David and Bathsheba'As has often been recited, the Daisy ad aired only once as a paid advertisement – on NBC during the network movie (DAVID AND BATHSHEBA) on Monday, September 7, 1964. Since that long ago Labor Day, the film of the child and her daisies has been re-played millions of times.
(Via BoingBoing, of course.)

I've seen it. It was very effective.
mdlbear: "Sometimes it's better to light a flamethrower than to curse the darkness" - Terry Pratchett (flamethrower)

In the interest of not feeding my depression, I don't think I'll make any political posts today other than pointing at [livejournal.com profile] ravan's annotated copy of the Declaration of Independence.

I find the name of our country's current president theocratic dictator ironic in the extreme.

added: Also go watch/listen to this opinion piece by Keith Olbermann, or read the text which has the last paragraph that was cut off in the video.

mdlbear: blue fractal bear with text "since 2002" (Default)

So it seems that Jerry Falwell died this morning. Far be it from me to speak ill of the dead.

But if the afterlife he so fervently believed in really exists, I hope he has taken up residence in the appropriate section of it.

mdlbear: (impeach)
So, the Shrub just finished his speech. But I don't recall him mentioning the fact that apparently the surge has apparently already begun. I expected the surge, but I thought he'd have the guts to admit it.
mdlbear: (impeach)

THIS VIDEO IS NOT SAFE FOR WORK. It is, however, funny as hell, highly political, and dead-on accurate. (From [livejournal.com profile] filkertom.) Offensive to Republicans, prudes, and the humor-impaired.

mdlbear: (distress)

From [livejournal.com profile] lapislaz comes this post linking through this SFGate column to this article in USA Today claiming that

The federal government's "no sex without marriage" message isn't just for kids anymore.

Now the government is targeting unmarried adults up to age 29 as part of its abstinence-only programs, which include millions of dollars in federal money that will be available to the states under revised federal grant guidelines for 2007.

The government says the change is a clarification. But critics say it's a clear signal of a more directed policy targeting the sexual behavior of adults.

"They've stepped over the line of common sense," said James Wagoner, president of Advocates for Youth, a Washington, D.C.-based non-profit that supports sex education. "To be preaching abstinence when 90% of people are having sex is in essence to lose touch with reality. It's an ideological campaign. It has nothing to do with public health."

Well, that's one way of putting it. I will refrain from further comment except to point out that, contrary to what you might expect, The Onion is not part of that chain of links.

mdlbear: (grrr)

'Zombies' file lawsuit against city of Mpls.

A group of zombies have risen up to claim the city of Minneapolis and Hennepin County violated their free rights and discriminated against them.

The six adults and one juvenile who were arrested while impersonating the undead in July filed their lawsuit Thursday.

The ragged group were arrested for "simulating weapons of mass destruction" during a dance party near the Minneapolis entertainment district.

Police alleged that wires protruding from the zombie's backpacks could have been bombs or were meant to imitate bombs. It was later learned the wires were actually radios.
(from BoingBoing -- where else?)
mdlbear: (distress)

Coming home from dropping the [livejournal.com profile] chaoswolf off at work this morning, I found myself briefly behind a car with "Honk if you love Jesus" painted on its rear windshield. Below that were two American flags on the trunk lid. Below that were two bumper stickers:

TRUTH not tolerance
Jesus loves you whether you like it or not.

No further comment.

mdlbear: (distress)

Oh, wait.

Get out there and VOTE the bums bastards party of torture, war, right-wing religious nuts, Guantanamo party that gutted the Bill of Rights Republicans out.

mdlbear: (impeach)
Boing Boing: Iraq invasion sim from 1999 warned of problems
A secret US wargame called "Desert Crossing" produced during the Clinton era showed that an invasion and post-war presence in Iraq would require around 400,000 troops -- about three times the number of troops stationed there now. Even with those resources, according to simulation output, the mission could result in chaos.
Why am I not surprised. (Article includes a link to "Post-Saddam Iraq: The War Game," released November 4, 2006 at George Washington University's National Security online document archives.)
mdlbear: (distress)
Republicans post nuke cookbook on line | The Register
The persistent delusions of senior Republicans in Congress and the President have led to the leaking of sensitive documents on nuclear weapons via the Web, the New York Times reports.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Peter Hoekstra (Republican, Michigan), and Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Pat Roberts (Republican, Kansas) were instrumental in establishing a Web archive called the "Operation Iraqi Freedom Document Portal". It was Hoekstra's, Roberts's, and apparently the President's, hope that by disseminating documents recovered from Iraq, some right-wing amateur researcher might eventually find a flaky shred of evidence suggesting that Saddam's regime had been involved in banned weapons production, which could then be trumpeted to the press.

The problem with clinging to vain hopes in this way is that a number of the documents (since removed) were believed to be far too graphic in describing nuclear weapons technology to be suitable for public exhibition.
mdlbear: (hill-of-three-oaks)

Reviewing some of the comments on my last post it occurred to me that, for many Christian science-fiction fans, fandom was almost certainly their first encounter with religious prejudice directed against them. And the present backlash against the excesses of the Religious Right, feeble though it is, represents the first time that I can remember public criticism of any sort being directed against Christians in the US (at least of the Protestant variety -- when I was growing up, Catholics were regarded in some parts of the country with almost as much suspicion as Jews).

I'm going to resist a number of temptations here, all of which seem likely to lead me into a swamp of bad memories and worse writing, and just drop the subject for now.

mdlbear: (impeach)

[livejournal.com profile] filkertom posted this reminder that it's Do-It-Yourself Impeachment Day. Print the papers, sign them, and send them in.

Impeach for Peace, a Minnesota-based impeachment group, has researched a method for impeaching the president using a little known and rarely used part of the Rules of the House of Representatives ("Jefferson's Manual"). This document actually empowers individual citizens to initiate the impeachment process themselves.

"Jefferson's Manual" is an interpretive guide to parliamentary procedure, and is included (along with the Constitution) in the bound volumes of the Rules of the House of Representatives. It is ratified by each congress (including the current one), and has been updated continuously through the history of our democracy. The section covering impeachment lists the acceptable vehicles for bringing impeachment motions to the floor of the House.

Before the House Judiciary Committee can put together the Articles of Impeachment, someone must initiate the impeachment procedure. Most often, this occurs when members of the House pass a resolution. Another method outlined in the manual, however, is for individual citizens to submit a memorial for impeachment.

After learning this information, Minnesotan and Impeach for Peace member (Jodin Morey) found precedent in an 1826 memorial by Luke Edward Lawless which had been successful in initiating the impeachment of Federal Judge James H. Peck. Impeach for Peace then used this as a template for their "Do-It-Yourself Impeachment." Now any citizen can download the DIY Impeachment Memorial and submit it, making it possible for Americans to do what our representatives have been unwilling to do. The idea is for so many people to submit the Memorial that it cannot be ignored.

Feel free to download it, print out TWO copies, fill in your relevant information in the blanks (name, State, etc.), and send in two letters today (One to the head of the Judiciary, and the other to John Conyers lead Democrat in the House Judiciary). There's also extra credit for sending a DIY Impeachment to your own representative.

mdlbear: (impeach)
In Case I Disappear - The Smirking Chimp
I have been told a thousand times at least, in the years I have spent reporting on the astonishing and repugnant abuses, lies and failures of the Bush administration, to watch my back. "Be careful," people always tell me. "These people are capable of anything. Stay off small planes, make sure you aren't being followed." A running joke between my mother and me is that she has a "safe room" set up for me in her cabin in the woods, in the event I have to flee because of something I wrote or said.

I always laughed and shook my head whenever I heard this stuff. Extreme paranoia wrapped in the tinfoil of conspiracy, I thought. This is still America, and these Bush fools will soon pass into history, I thought. I am a citizen, and the First Amendment hasn't yet been red-lined, I thought.

Matters are different now.

(from this post by [livejournal.com profile] filkertom)
mdlbear: "Sometimes it's better to light a flamethrower than to curse the darkness" - Terry Pratchett (flamethrower)
Senate gives final approval to detainee bill - Yahoo! News
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania said the right to challenge one's detention was fundamental in American law, and the Supreme Court would reject the plan if it were stripped.

"This is wrong. It is unconstitutional. It is un-American," said Patrick Leahy of Vermont, the committee's top Democrat. He said it was intended to choke off access to Guantanamo to "ensure that the Bush-Cheney administration will never again be embarrassed by a United States Supreme Court decision reviewing its unlawful abuses of power."
[...]
"This bill gives an administration that lobbied for torture exactly what it wanted," said Sen. John Kerry, a Massachusetts Democrat.
Additional comments by [livejournal.com profile] ravan [here], [livejournal.com profile] filkertom [here], [livejournal.com profile] kyburg [here], and Wil Wheaton

Excuse me?

2006-09-17 06:27 pm
mdlbear: (penguin-rant)
Guardian Unlimited | Special reports | Muslim world divided over Pope's apology
Pope Benedict's admission that he was "deeply sorry" for offending the sensitivities of Muslims does not necessarily mean that the worst crisis of his papacy is over yet. Speaking in Rome yesterday, the Pope said that the views of the 14th-century Byzantine emperor Manuel II Palaeologus that he quoted last week - describing Islam as "evil and inhuman" - were not his own.
...but presumably he wouldn't have quoted them if they didn't say what he wanted to say.

Now, it is possible to argue -- and I've seen several attempts over the last couple of days -- that Muslim terrorism has a higher bodycount during the last couple of centuries than Christian. Possibly even if you omit 09/11 and the IRA. I'm not sure about the crusades. But the former head of the organization once known as the Inquisition is hardly in a position to cast stones, and he damned well ought to know better.
mdlbear: (sureal time)

From [livejournal.com profile] slothman comes this post pointing us at A Child’s Machiavelli: a Primer on Power by the artist Claudia Hart. It's out of print, but you can download the PDF.
mdlbear: "Sometimes it's better to light a flamethrower than to curse the darkness" - Terry Pratchett (flamethrower)
Legal Precedent Set for Web Accessibility: Financial News - Yahoo! Finance
BERKELEY, Calif., Sept. 7 /PRNewswire/ -- A federal district court judge ruled yesterday that a retailer may be sued if its website is inaccessible to the blind. The ruling was issued in a case brought by the National Federation of the Blind against Target Corp. (Northern District of California Case No. C 06-01802 MHP) The suit charges that Target's website ( http://www.target.com ) is inaccessible to the blind, and therefore violates the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the California Unruh Civil Rights Act, and the California Disabled Persons Act. Target asked the court to dismiss the action by arguing that no law requires Target to make its website accessible. The Court denied Target's motion to dismiss and held that the federal and state civil rights laws do apply to a website such as target.com.
...and about bloody time!

I've been saying this for years: making your site accessible to the blind also makes it accessible to the nearsighted (like me), people using mobile phones and other handheld devices, and above all to search engines. Want to know what your site looks like to Google? Just look at it in Lynx.

(from Slashdot)
mdlbear: (impeach)

NSA's Warrantless Wiretaps: How NSA Does It by Jerry Nelson

The Executive Branch has refused to tell very many Congressman very much about how the NSA system works. The secrecy seemed pointless to me, since any good technologist could figure it out. So I did. Not even your elected representatives could find out what I am about to tell you.

[...]

I leave you with one thought: neither God nor Nature owe the United States of America a democracy. If citizens give away all their freedoms, eventually they will have none. When the powerful have all the options and you have none, you are toast.

Democracies are not conquered. Democracies do not end when outsiders force them into subjugation. Democracies end when their citizens vote for a strongman who promises to protect them.

Here is how the National Security Agency is protecting you.

Remember what I've been saying about warrantless wiretaps? Nelson is saying it, too. Nothing new here, but it's thorough and well-written. As he says, "any good technologist could figure it out", but apparently not any politician. No surprise.

(Via [livejournal.com profile] cryptome)

mdlbear: (impeach)
From [livejournal.com profile] ravan comes a link to this little article by someone called electronpusher pointing out that triacetone triperoxide is actually quite difficult to make, and would probably not be very effective on an airplane. (I will note in passing that I was also badly mistaken about how easy concentrated H2O2 is to handle.)

The obvious conclusion, however, is not that the whole plot was a hoax, but that the triacetone triperoxide was either due to an overeager reporter looking up "peroxide" without reading the rest of the article, or possibly a deliberate smokescreen put up by the authorities to hide the real explosive. On the whole I lean toward the first explanation: we already know from other details that the explosive was a binary mixture one component of which was a powder. (Triacetone triperoxide has three components, all liquids: acetone, H2O2, and sulfuric acid.)

Another highly amusing take on the matter can be found in The Register under the title Yanks not impressed with UK terror emergency. Here they conclude that "either that US officials are quite underwhelmed by the UK's evidence of a feasible terrorist plot, or that the US government's casual indifference toward catastrophic loss of life and property, as exhibited when New Orleans was destroyed, is the new American attitude." They conclude:
Whether we're seeing the true Bushie callousness laid bare, or a healthy American skepticism toward HMG's repeated exhibition of a phony terrorist menace as a pretext to introduce the Kafka-esque legislation favored by Tony Blair and John Reid, will be answered by and by. There will be successful prosecutions, or there will be official excuses verging on an apology, but not quite amounting to one.
mdlbear: (impeach)

We’re Not in Lake Wobegon Anymore -- In These Times -- a well-written tirade against the current Republican party, by Garrison Keillor. (From [livejournal.com profile] filkerdave)

Here in 2004, George W. Bush is running for reelection on a platform of tragedy—the single greatest failure of national defense in our history, the attacks of 9/11 in which 19 men with box cutters put this nation into a tailspin, a failure the details of which the White House fought to keep secret even as it ran the country into hock up to the hubcaps, thanks to generous tax cuts for the well-fixed, hoping to lead us into a box canyon of debt that will render government impotent, even as we engage in a war against a small country that was undertaken for the president’s personal satisfaction but sold to the American public on the basis of brazen misinformation, a war whose purpose is to distract us from an enormous transfer of wealth taking place in this country, flowing upward, and the deception is working beautifully.

mdlbear: "Sometimes it's better to light a flamethrower than to curse the darkness" - Terry Pratchett (flamethrower)

Boing Boing: Only traitors try to make us afraid of terrorists

In this mind-blowing, exhaustively researched Cato institute paper by Ohio State University's John Mueller, the case against being afraid of terrorism is laid out in irrefutable logic, backed with credible, documented statistics about terrorism's risks. From the number of fatalities produced by terrorism to the trends in terrorism death to the fact that almost no one has ever died from a military biological agent to the fact that poison gas and dirty bombs in the field do only minor damage -- this paper is the most reassuring and infuriating piece of analysis I've read since September 11th, 2001.

The bottom line is, terrorism doesn't kill many people. Even in Israel, you're four times more likely to die in a car wreck than as a result of a terrorist attack. In the USA, you need to be more worried about lightning strikes than terrorism. The point of terrorism is to create terror, and by cynically convincing us that our very countries are at risk from terrorism, our politicians have delivered utter victory to the terrorists: we are terrified.

(PDF link)

This is something I've been saying for a long time. You're much more likely to be killed in a drive-by shooting than in a terrorist attack.

Until 2001, far fewer Americans were killed in any group- ing of years by all forms of international terrorism than were killed by lightning, and almost none of those terrorist deaths occurred within the United States itself. Even with the Sep- tember 11 attacks included in the count, the number of Americans killed by international terrorism since the late 1960s (which is when the State Department began counting) is about the same as the number of Americans killed over the same period by lightning, accident-causing deer, or severe allergic reaction to peanuts.

And, let's face it, folks: nobody is going to hijack a plane and fly it into a building, ever again. Even unarmed, a planeful of enraged passengers is going to be more than a match for a handful of terrorists. The only thing gained by the "increased" airport security is to make people think the politicians are doing something about the terrorist threat, and to make that threat seem greater than it actually is. Their reasons for doing this are left as an exercise for the reader.

mdlbear: (impeach)
Secret court secretly reviewing secret wiretaps | The Register -- wonderfully vitriolic article on current doings in Washington.
Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Arlen Specter (Republican, Pennsylvania) has crafted proposed legislation, pre-approved by the White House, enabling the FISA star chamber court to rubber-stamp the NSA's massive, warrantless wiretap program, and decide that it is constitutional. Clearly, the Republicans don't want the Supremes to get their hands on this one, although it is hard to imagine them letting the FISA court have the last word.
It goes on to mention military tribunals, the National Asset Database (which includes such juicy terror targets as a petting zoo and the Amish Country Popcorn Factory in Indiana.)
mdlbear: (impeach)

NY Times accused of treason | The Register

US Representative Peter King (Republican, New York), chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, has called the New York Times "treasonous" for informing the public about another secret Bush Administration counter-terrorist program, the Associated Press reports.

The article (in The Register) is worth reading, since it goes on to point out that the Bush administration's trolling through banking records is already under investigation in Belgium. Unlike the US, some European countries actually have effective data privacy laws.)

Meanwhile, here in the US, we are rapidly approaching the time when any attempt at all to publicly hold the Administration to account for its crimes will be considered "treasonous". Oops!

mdlbear: (impeach)

Was the 2004 Election Stolen? (from Rolling Stone by way of this post by [livejournal.com profile] ravan.)

Republicans prevented more than 350,000 voters in Ohio from casting ballots or having their votes counted -- enough to have put John Kerry in the White House.

Like many Americans, I spent the evening of the 2004 election watching the returns on television and wondering how the exit polls, which predicted an overwhelming victory for John Kerry, had gotten it so wrong. By midnight, the official tallies showed a decisive lead for George Bush -- and the next day, lacking enough legal evidence to contest the results, Kerry conceded. Republicans derided anyone who expressed doubts about Bush's victory as nut cases in ''tinfoil hats,'' while the national media, with few exceptions, did little to question the validity of the election. The Washington Post immediately dismissed allegations of fraud as ''conspiracy theories,'' and The New York Times declared that ''there is no evidence of vote theft or errors on a large scale.''

But despite the media blackout, indications continued to emerge that something deeply troubling had taken place in 2004. Nearly half of the 6 million American voters living abroad never received their ballots -- or received them too late to vote -- after the Pentagon unaccountably shut down a state-of-the-art Web site used to file overseas registrations. A consulting firm called Sproul & Associates, which was hired by the Republican National Committee to register voters in six battleground states, was discovered shredding Democratic registrations. In New Mexico, which was decided by 5,988 votes, malfunctioning machines mysteriously failed to properly register a presidential vote on more than 20,000 ballots. Nationwide, according to the federal commission charged with implementing election reforms, as many as 1 million ballots were spoiled by faulty voting equipment -- roughly one for every 100 cast

You'd think that after what happened in Florida in 2000, people would be on the alert for something like this. Not that anything could have been done about it -- what we've seen in this country is a very quiet, very deliberate right-wing coup.

I'd like my country back, please.

mdlbear: (impeach)

Telcos wish to deny mass snooping | The Register

Furthermore, both companies have said they "cannot confirm or deny" that they've got a relationship with the NSA. Now, trust a journo on this one: in the commercial world, and in the political world, whenever a flack can deny something that might be bad for trade, share values, or winning the election, they always deny it. "I cannot confirm or deny" always means, "I cannot deny". There are no exceptions to this rule outside the realm of legal constraints against commenting in any way (gag orders, etc).

The Reg. does a pretty good job of parsing the careful, contorted language that Verizon and BellSouth use in "denying" that they've given anything to the NSA. And I understand the Brooklyn Bridge is up for sale on eBay...

mdlbear: (impeach)
Federal Source to ABC News: We Know Who You're Calling
A senior federal law enforcement official tells ABC News the government is tracking the phone numbers we (Brian Ross and Richard Esposito) call in an effort to root out confidential sources.

"It's time for you to get some new cell phones, quick," the source told us in an in-person conversation.

ABC News does not know how the government determined who we are calling, or whether our phone records were provided to the government as part of the recently-disclosed NSA collection of domestic phone calls.

Other sources have told us that phone calls and contacts by reporters for ABC News, along with the New York Times and the Washington Post, are being examined as part of a widespread CIA leak investigation.

They seem surprised. Damned if I know why.

The comments are a mixed bag -- everything from "leakers are traitors -- hang them" to "welcome to the KGB", plus a couple of moderately insightful folks asking where the media were when Bush was running for re-election.
mdlbear: (impeach)

Although the outrage is only now hitting the headlines, they've actually been pretty open about it for months, as this article and its references make clear. (From [livejournal.com profile] finagler.) The Washington Post had an article in early February that says straight out that "NSA rules since the late 1970s, when machine filtering was far less capable, have said 'acquisition' of content does not take place until a conversation is intercepted and processed 'into an intelligible form intended for human inspection.'"

So the government has been spying on us for years, and the plain facts in the press have largely gone unnoticed until suddenly King George has an appointee to shift the blame onto. At this point there are only two likely possibilities:

  1. He'll stonewall the hard questions, claiming "national security", get approved anyway, and the invertebrates in the Senate will slink back to their holes.
  2. He'll drop out rather than answer the hard questions, to be replaced with someone even worse but less well-known.

I knew my phone was being tapped thirty-odd years ago. Welcome to the goldfish bowl.

mdlbear: (impeach)

Or at least a strong indication of the Party Line, from this article

Former NSA Director Bob Inman said the use of telephone and other databases might not have violated privacy rights. That's because the initial explorations were automated and personal information wouldn't have spread any further in most cases \u2014 a position supported by a former Bush administration official familiar with the monitoring program.

"Computers may have sorted through hundreds of millions of messages without a person ever seeing it. So no one's e-mail or phone call has been compromised," Inman said. "The problem only starts when the information goes to an analyst to read."

So there you have it, just as I said here. Computer wiretapping isn't really wiretapping, torture that doesn't leave a mark isn't really torture, laws the president disagrees with aren't really laws, speech on the internet isn't really speech, and don't even get me started on freedom of religion.

mdlbear: (impeach)

Shocked, I tell you! To think that the government is tapping our phones!

Am I the only one who isn't surprised? Here we have CNN and Reuters saying that "President George W. Bush denied on Thursday the government was "trolling through" Americans' personal lives, despite a report that [the NSA] was collecting phone records of tens of millions of citizens", and that "Bush did not confirm or deny the USA Today report. But he did say that U.S. intelligence targets terrorists and that the government does not listen to domestic telephone calls without court approval and that Congress has been briefed on intelligence programs."

Am I the only one who thinks that Bush is lying?

Here's what I think is behind the "warrantless wiretapping" program, and why it really has to be warrantless: they're listening to everything. The to/from numbers don't really need to go into a database -- that's how the phone companies keep track of billing. All they have to do is give the government access. That's the part they don't mind leaking. It's annoying, but it's obvious.

The part they don't want to get out, is that, probably, almost every single call is being listened to -- not by humans, of course (so they'll argue in court, if it comes down to it, that it's technically not listening at all) but by computers running speech recognition software. The software isn't very good -- it can't provide even approximate transcripts -- but it doesn't have to be. All it has to do is recognize a handful of keywords (like "bomb") and a couple of languages (like Arabic). That's enough to flag a call for more scrutiny, so they keep the recording and run it past a human. If it seems "suspicious", they look through the call database for a chain of calls linking it to a foreign number or somebody they're watching. Six degrees of separation says they'll probably find such a chain, so off they go to a (secret) court with the evidence they need to tap the phone.

mdlbear: blue fractal bear with text "since 2002" (Default)

Catholic News Service: Vatican says freedom of expression does not mean offending religions

The Vatican, commenting on a series of satirical newspaper cartoons that have outraged Muslims, said freedom of expression does not include the right to offend religious sentiments.

At the same time, the Vatican said, violent reactions are equally deplorable.

"Intolerance -- wherever it comes from, whether real or verbal, action or reaction -- always constitutes a serious threat to peace," Vatican spokesman Joaquin Navarro-Valls said in a statement Feb. 4.

(From The Volokh Conspiracy by way of DocBug.)

Bad church: no cookie. Any deity that can't handle satire, scholarly scrutiny, scientific facts, and even consumer complaints is obviously not omniscient, not omnipotent, and in fact has a serious inferiority complex. The Jews have been poking fun at, studying, and even complaining about (and to) their deity for thousands of years, and He apparently hasn't abandoned them yet. Any religion that can't handle satire, scrutiny, hard facts, and skepticism is clearly inhabiting a fantasy world of its own making.

And any religion that claims to have a corner on religious truth, in spite of the obvious fact that every other religion has claims of roughly equal validity, has a very high probabability of being simply wrong. That's the essence of fanaticism, folks -- being so certain of one's own beliefs that you can use them to justify any action, no matter how evil. It's not the only excuse for terrorism, to be sure, but it's a common one.

mdlbear: blue fractal bear with text "since 2002" (Default)

...that the story about the student who was visited by the Feds after requesting a copy of Mao's little red book on interlibrary loan turns out to have been a hoax. Some people, including Gary McGath, spotted inconsistancies right away.

On the other hand, it's sad and appalling that we live in a country, and under a government, where it was easy to believe that it wasn't a hoax.

Be warned

2005-11-22 08:58 pm
mdlbear: blue fractal bear with text "since 2002" (Default)

From [livejournal.com profile] gridlore:

A Nation Under God

Let others worry about the rapture: For the increasingly powerful Christian Reconstruction movement, the task is to establish the Kingdom of God right now--from the courthouse to the White House.

...

In this worldview, the mandate for Christians is not just to live right or to help their neighbors: They are called upon to take over or eliminate the institutions of secular government.

Most Popular Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Page generated 2025-07-01 06:17 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios